grumman tiger vs cessna 172

Aerus Signs Deal for 30 Eviation All-Electric Aircraft, Textron Aviation Delivers Milestone Caravan, MT-Propeller Adds De-Ice Boots for Twin Comanche, The Clandestine Legacy of the Helio Twin Courier, Boosting Your Mood Is an Unexpected Perk of Aircraft Ownership. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected, Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. I don't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying. get there? I "think" you can fly around with the canopy open.is that correct? https://thepilotsplace.com/forum/login. AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, AA-5B & AG-5B Tiger Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program Instructors. Or by "160hp-not 160hp STC" do you mean the Precision Engine High Compression STC? Am I safe to buy a Cheetah, get IFR and build 200 hours then sell -- or will I get bored before then and wish I would have waited for a Tiger? All rights reserved. same friendly, informative place for all things Cessna 172, now with a larger Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. This month we will compare the two aircraft the Flying Educators have operated in their 57, based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport (KFXE), . The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. Still, I think the additional climb rate of the Tiger makes it a better choice, even if speed is not a major concern. Please head over to our new home at the Pilots Place Forum. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Aero on Demand, a Houston-based club, also operates a Tiger and it is equipped with an engine monitor providing very accurate data. If you plan to carry heavy loads, you should go with the Cessna 172. I know you can upgrade a Cheetah to 180 hp and essentially a Tiger. Kinda dicey actually. The Main Differences Between the Piper Archer and Cessna 172. Guy has over 100K in it and he is selling for 57K. The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. And its either retractable, more horse power or probably both, OR AN RV which won't carry nearly as much. Or you might prefer the Grumman AA5B, or perhaps the Diamond DV20/DA20 Katana, Ercoupe 415-C, or Diamond DA40 Star, all of which are said to be safe and easy to fly. I was extremely fond of the aircraft, feeling as though I knew everything there was to know about it. Moving to the Grumman Tiger meant they could have a four-place aircraft better suited for cross-country travel and still have a plane that was responsive. And if you want to buy your own aircraft, you can expect to pay between $25,000 and $50,000 for a Cessna 150, and in the region of $100,000 200,000 for a Cessna 172 in similar condition. Approachable Aircraft: Grumman AA-5 Series. A 1975 Grumman AA-5B Tiger (N74429) \u0026 a 1997 Cessna 172R Skyhawk landing on Runway 10 at Princeton Airport (39N) in New Jersey followed by a 1982 Eurocopter AS366 TwinStar (N355MT) taking off shortly upon my arrival on the field. The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said theFlying Educators usually fly ateconomy cruise and get 115ktsto 120ktsground speed whilethe180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buckcomes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get the most speed for the least cost, Greg said. If you had a Tiger without the autopilot, its not going to be quite as stable as a 172 or a 182. Your login, avatars, posts and archives have all be relocated there. Autopilot, 430W, PS Engineering audio panel, JPI 830, new paint and interior. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krish's . I am not very tall, and I cannot safely fly early Cessna 172s I need two cushions in order to reach the pedals and see outside clearly, and I once had one of them slip as I was about to land! The Flying Educators isan equity clubfounded in 1962based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport (KFXE). Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. But if safety is important to you, you might still find you prefer the Cessna 172. Insurance should be similarly straightforward. Get the Tiger, you local flights will get boring after 100 hours and you'll want to stretch out to further destinations. It's kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the distances weren't far. Tiger owner here. The Cessna 150-152 and light taildraggers have been the stalwarts of basic, entry-level aviation. , The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. If you currently have an account on Pilots Place, your send a link to set up your password on the Pilots Place site, and when you With a fuel burn at cruise of around 5 GPH, she does better than my Chevy S10. They can provide anything for the airplanewheels, wheel pants, windshields, cowlings, anything you need for a Tiger or similar Grumman aircraftthey can provide.. I toured all of Europe in one of these, with a friend. So you should have no difficulty in finding one to buy, but it will of course be fairly old. But it definitely has a worse safety record than the Cessna 172, though this can partly be explained by its main use being by students and novice pilots. The Cessna 172 is a lot heavier and more powerful than the Cessna 150, and when I did this conversion I found the Cessna 172 difficult to manage at first. In the AG-5B, the 12-volt electrical system was replaced with a 24-volt system, and the refresh included several minor systems and aerodynamic improvements, plus improved corrosion coating. In the early 90s up to the when the Flying Educators sold the Citabria in 1995, the hourly rate was $21 wet, and the monthly club dues were $42. Die Grumman-Tiger-Familie im Steckbrief AG-5B haben eine praktische, auf beiden Seiten aufklappbare Cowling und ein verbessertes Heizungs- und Lftungssystem. You all are so wrong. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. The Tiger was the outcome of the same redesign work on the AA-5 Traveler that resulted in the 150 hp (110 kW) Cheetah and it was originally little more than the same aircraft with a Lycoming O-360-A4K 180 hp (130 kW) engine, resulting in a 139-knot (257 km/h) cruise speed. This month we will compare the two aircraft the Flying Educators have operated in their 57-year history the Citabriaand theGrumman Tiger. It burns 7 gph and the clubcharges $86 an hour. The four-place Grumman AA-5 family might be one of the better-kept secrets, offering the simplicity of a Cessna 172 while approaching the cruise speed of a similarly powered Mooney. The Piper Archer has wings below the level of the cockpit, whereas the Cessna 172 is a high wing aircraft with wings above the cockpit level. Maintenance technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was designed with simplicity in mind. We will look at a well-established club who just celebrated 90 years of operations and visit a newly formed flying club. Still not fast enough to be a real cross country plane, imho. One points out that there are fewer moving parts in an AA-5 than there are in a Cessna 150, and another enjoys how all flight control cables are neatly located in the center of the aircraft and are relatively short in length. So what are both these Cessna aircraft like to fly? After 5 years I wonder if the deal was done. So please dont just leap into a Cessna 172 with no experience and expect it to be just like the Cessna 150; it is different. , the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. I am very familiar with both these aircraft types. Its only got two seats anda relatively small baggagecompartment, so itwould be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. Like any aerodynamically efficient airframe, proper speed management is important on approach and landing. Every Cessna 172 or Cherokee 140 I fly with is quickly left in the dust by a good 10 to 15 knots. The Flying Educators Tiger has a two-axis autopilot so it frequently flies under IFR. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. I only have time in the AA1X series, the baby brother of the tiger, the canopy design I think is one of the better ones in GA, no issues, the free castor nose wheel was great for ground handling, nice shock absorbing and strong fiberglass mains, good fuel tank system, etc. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. Apologies for the shakiness.Aircraft: Grumman AA-5B Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk \u0026 Eurocopter AS355 TwinStarTime of Day: 2:53 PMDate: November 2nd, 2022 He will be an excellent resource. They can provide anything for the airplanewheels, wheel pants, windshields, cowlings, anything you need for a Tiger or similar Grumman aircraftthey can provide., Greg said the club didnt have any problem renewing its insurance with. Aero on Demand, a Houston-based club, also operates a Tiger and it is equipped with an engine monitor providing very accurate data. CTAF audio is included. So again, if you want to take the family on holiday, having a plane which is faster, more powerful, and can carry more weight, may decide things for you. At the end of the day, Greg noted that most members fly solo or with only one passenger and, for that reason, the airplane has to be fun to fly, and it is. If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platformwith good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. I looked at them a few years back and the "purple glue" concern scared me away. Picture . All was in order etc, just don't know much about the plane. Visibility is amazing. But we were both fairly small, and we did have to limit ourselves to only a small amount of luggage, so as not to find ourselves with weight and balance issues. would be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. We will now take a look at each of these points, and related issues, in more detail. If so did he sell it after 2 or 3 years and get into a twin? If you are looking for a good all-round airplane thats easy to fly, can carry passengers, and will do most of the things any private pilot wants, then the Cessna 172 should be perfect for you. In 1971, when American Aviation became Grumman American, the company identified a need for a four-seat aircraft. (I'm at Hollywood aviation in the plane ports. Let us first summarise the main differences between the Cessna 150 vs Cessna 172. The Skyhawk and Cherokee families have long served as the go-to solution for economical four-place aircraftand more-powerful, complex machines like those from Mooney and Beechcraft have defined the top of the single-engine-piston market. If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platform. The seats move further forward in the more modern versions of the Cessna 172, but even so, I find it easier to fly the Cessna 150, where everything is within easy reach. Its roll rate is faster than a Piper or Cessna. Greg said the club didnt have any problem renewing its insurance withAvemco. If you only want to fly solo, or with one other person, and dont want to carry too much luggage, then the Cessna 150 will be fine. Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. I was gonna ask him the same thing. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Tiger owner here. They charge $90 an hour wet. The Citabria wins this category over the Tiger without question. The cockpit of the Cessna 150 is very cramped. The club usesAvemcoand pays $6,000 a year, but Greg noted that Florida is an expensivestate in whichto insure an aircraft because of hurricanes and the fact the state is highly litigious. I don't know the details of his financial situation, but I think he could pop for a Tiger without breaking a sweat. first Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. Externally the Tiger looked much like the AA-5 Traveler and AA-5A Cheetah so once again Grumman's marketing department came up with a distinctive decal package to differentiate the design this time a "galloping tiger". Wow, that is a beautiful Tiger, congrats! The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. "Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. This is at least the third Tiger thread in two days. It was largely a matter of economics, Greg said. Although the airplane hasnt been manufactured for quite some time, Greg said parts are easy to get. Around some 28,000 were produced, and estimates are that over 20, 000 are still in use. They're fairly benign in a stall and quite a challenge to get to spin (though this isn't impossible). People tend to step on the seats just a problem of not knowing how to get in the plane, I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. It will also carry more weight, as mentioned above. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected,andthere can be rusty tubes in the tail. The Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still in production. The first time someone gets into an airplane like that and youre taxiing with a crosswind, you want to drag the brake to keep it going straight, Greg said. You solo it from thefront so youve got good visibility, and, like the Champ it is derived from, it is an easy, forgiving airplane. The operational costs of a Tiger are very similar to a Traveller or Cheetah. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. A number of Cheetahs can be found equipped with the 180 hp O-360, which is available as an STC. Tiger owners report cruise speeds of 125 to 133 knots at 8.5 to 10 gallons per hour, while owners with 160 hp Cheetahs fly about 10 knots slower with a slightly lower fuel burn. A number of these became known as Gulfstream Americans when Gulfstream bought the Grumman line and sold them through 1979. Aerodynamischer Feinschliff verbesserte die Reisegeschwindigkeit von 139 auf 143 Knoten. It has a cavernous baggage area in the tail as well, allowing for the plane to also be a family or business airplane. Click Otherwise, owners report that the AA-5 family is largely free of issues, and they enjoy great support and parts availability from companies such as Excel-Air Services in Indiana and Fletchair in Texas. 180-hp Lycoming O360 burns 10 gph. What do I need to do? The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. There should be few problems with maintenance for either of these aircraft types. Also See: Cessna 150 vs 172; Cessna 180 vs 185 Perhaps you are on a tight budget, are rather small and struggle to reach controls in some airplanes, or really dont want or need a four-seater aircraft. All spars are life-limited to 12,000 to 12,500 hours, underscoring the importance of having a detailed logbook history. The wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view. But the Cessna 150 is not unsafe by any means. With relatively few problem areas, ADs or areas of concern with regard to flying characteristics, the AA-5 family checks many of the boxes required to earn its place as an approachable aircraft. One maintainer reports that the majority of incidents he sees are a result of runway overruns that began with excessive speed on final approach. The Citabria breed has an AD requiring a one-time inspection of the wooden spar where they have to check it for cracks. Help me understand the wing structure. You get the sense of sitting at a low desk on a mountaintop. That phrase sort of confuses me. It was a very inexpensive airplane. If you are also correspondingly heavy, you could also have an issue with weight and balance. Owners of both these aircraft types usually like them a lot. So if you plan to take the family on holiday or something similar, the Cessna 172 is probably what you will need. Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by WVTexan, Nov 21, 2013. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. What are your thoughts and experience? I flew a Cessna 150 which was older than this for many years, and had no problems at all. Which engine did he install? Accordingly, AA-5s are quick to convert a light nudge of the yoke into an instant change in attitude. 2023 The Grumman Owners and Pilots Association. To provide a more up-to-date cost perspective, the Wild River Flying Club in Osceola, WI operates a 1979 Citabria with a 150-hp Lycoming O-320. Come join us! Its well suite, Grumman produced the AA5B Tiger from 1975 through 1979, and then American General produced the AG5B Tiger from 1991 through 1993. The airplane received minor aerodynamic improvements for the 1975 model year, which was its last year of production. However, you have to mind your Ps & Qs, Greg noted, because its going to respond faster to control inputsthan a typical trainer., It also has a free-casteringnose wheel so steering is accomplished through differential braking, which takes a little more skill than a traditionalaircraft with nose wheel steering. This isn't chump speed, since the AA-5, by virtue of its slab-sided honeycomb panel fuselage, is hardly slick in the drag department. The reason Flying Educators switched from, country flying. ), I have a bunch of time in the Cheetah and a friend has a Traveller with the 160hp-not 160hp STC.

Cleveland Police Exposed, Christopher Scott Cherot Married, Patrick Thornberry Yoga, Jonathan Allen Nbc Weight Loss, Articles G