24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. try clicking the minimize button instead. 18CV327382]. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 7 V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 15 (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. You can always see your envelopes V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. 12 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). INTRODUCTION 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. LLC, et al. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. I. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 10 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Superior Court (1986) . Pay Traffic Tickets. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. of its intention to appear. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Factual and Procedural Background 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. RAMIREZ, ET AL. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. I. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before Footnote 15: 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. INTRODUCTION Civil Law and Motion ext. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. BACKGROUND Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. vs. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Line 4 I. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. Court Calendars. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and 14 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO INTRODUCTION II. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 16 vs. . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 24 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Background Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 408.882.2296 (fax) Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. will be able to access it on trellis. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication smanoukian@scsCourt.org Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 408.882.2296 (fax) The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. 408.882.2296 (fax) Tentative Rulings. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Last. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE vs. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). BACKGROUND: If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). SHUFF, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to Background This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Background CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Aug. 4, 2022) No. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 24 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. INTRODUCTION Patricia M. Lucas. 12 The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Case Records Search. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING RETAIL, INC., ET AL. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 9 Background This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Background and Discovery Dispute V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. 21 I. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 4 SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. SAETERN, ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted for each matter on the next day's calendar. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Background The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. INTRODUCTION Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). 8 JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.
+ 48 602 120 990
biuro@modus.org.pl
Najnowsze komentarze