fomapan 400 vs hp5

Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Hopefully the results above prove me right. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Thanks Matthias! Although these werent excessively For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. Thank you Victor! To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. You are using an out of date browser. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. Both of the images below are lower contrast than anything Id ever print, but as you can see, whilst we still have some detail in the shadows on the Kentmere image, our Fomapan has some pretty fine detail right across the image. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. Some people love it, some hate it. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. Can you talk about what developers you used? I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. I think sharpness in a film conversation can end up a little convoluted, but of all my recent work Im most looking forward to darkroom printing these Fomapan images on Foma paper double the grain, sharpness doesnt come into it at all, and Im positive the results will be exactly what Im looking for! I'm open to any dispute. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. That could be quite a difference. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." You know what they basically said? I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. D-76 is OK. News, Tips & Reviews. I still prefer Tri-X but its a if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. To me, the film seems muddy. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. DD-X is already to go. What a difference! I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. 200 is of course fine, and in accord with the earlier ASA rating system. The golden rule of film photography is to shoot for the shadows and develop for the highlights, however Id caution overexposing this film too much. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. Push Fomapan 400. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Both are unique and can not replace the other. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). For your last two pictures I can only guess. Fibonawak 8 mo. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. I thankfully finally ran out of the 100ft. Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. My negatives always look really dull. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Black and rich and whites are vivid. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. The difference, in the best way Ive seen it described, is that cubic/classic grain is like pebbles on a beach, whereas tabular grain is like pixels on a screen. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. . ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? Thank you Daniel! Quote; Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! I get where you are coming from. Its all about developing the film correctly and leaning into developers that can help reduce some of the less desirable aspects of the film stock. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. I want to try the films out myself now. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). You cannot paste images directly. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. As registered member you'd see an image here. Thanks John! Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. However, dependable old Tri-X 400 at 320 works for me, especially in 120 size. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Trees dont move. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? weil rodinal von AGFA ist. Theres any number of things I could try. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. 1. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Really glad you found it useful! In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Noticeable halation. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. Alternativ knnte man auch einen 400er in dem Silvermax- Entwickler mal eintesten. Id probably let it sit in the developer a little longer next time.Regardless of the negative density, the results speak for themself - just look at the detail in the chrome of the motorcycle pictured below. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. November 20, 2019. Ive even shot the movie at a World War 1 event at Torontos historic Fort York, and it looked amazing, especially when I framed the images right to avoid the modern condos surrounding the fort today. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. 1. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! I really disliked Fomapan 400. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. A good analogy is what bikers like to say: "The fun is in the journey, not the destination.". I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. Corrected a couple of typos in the original piece. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Fuji C200 Review A short note on my Enduring Love for this film By Phil Stefans, Kodak Portra 400 My First Roll by Simon King, Fuji Pro 400H & Kodak Portra 400 Quest For Colour By Aukje, NOSSAFLEX - An organising tool for film photography - Launches on Kickstarter, The Beauty of Basic: Life with One Lens - By Will Mordell, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). Learn how your comment data is processed. The grain is fairly fine. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). The Professional's Source Since 1973 For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. 5x7 Fomapan 200 at e.i. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. With some loaders there is no actual gate, just a labyrinth which prevents the light from entering more than an inch or so. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. You can post now and register later. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay.

Quien Era Gulp En La Carabina De Ambrosio, Abc Radio Morning Presenters, 1985 Detroit Tigers Roster, Articles F